Weber’s Key Relationships

In his Versuch einer geordneten Theorie der Tonsetzkunst, Gottfried Weber discusses in volume II, section VI, §§ 161-180 (2d edition, Mainz, Schott, 1824, pp. 64-81) the relationships between keys. He first presents the nearest relationships in major (§§ 162-168, major dominant, major subdominant, minor submediant and minor parallel keys), representing them in a figure analogous to (more precisely a dual graph of) Euler’s Tonnetz:

He continues with the nearest relationships in minor (§§ 169-175), the relationships of second degree in major (§§ 176-177) and in minor (§ 178), the distant relationships (§ 179), each illustrated with a similar figure, and ends in § 180 (p. 81) with a “table of all key relationships”, which extends to twelve fifths on the vertical axis and four thirds (both from major to major and from minor to minor) on the horizontal axis, i.e. in both directions until the enharmonic equivalent is reached:

This figure is at the origin of Schœnberg’s “Chart of the Regions” in major and in minor, in Structural Functions of Harmony (London, Ernst Benn, 1983, pp. 20 and 30).

N. Meeùs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close